Justice Slammed Over Countrywide Pact
Senators fault the Justice Department for its acceptance of a $355 million settlement between the agency and Bank of America over alleged mortgage lending bias by the bank’s Countrywide Financial Corporation subsidiary. The lawmakers on the Judiciary Committee argue that payments going to some borrowers aren’t enough to remedy damages.
The settlement focuses on race, alleging that some black and Hispanic borrowers between 2004 and 2008 were charged higher interest rates and fees because of their race, not because of their credit history or ability to pay the premiums. The pact also alleges that minority borrowers with strong credit were targeted and steered into subprime loans when similarly qualified white borrowers were awarded prime loans.
Lawmakers took out their ire on Thomas Perez, assistant attorney general of the DOJ’s civil rights division. Perez acknowledges the shortcomings in the settlement, explaining it was not a “home run,” but he defends the move saying the DOJ has set up a task force to investigate and pursue illegal financial activity as a result.
That explanation doesn’t sit will with Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA), the panel’s ranking Republican. “The department’s message is crime does pay,” Grassley says. “Light settlements and no prosecutions not only do not deter. They invite crimes of this sort to occur against similar future victims,”
Grassley addresses the estimated average settlement of $1,700 per victim among the more than 200,000 blacks and Hispanics involved in the settlement.
Perez responds that banks complain the DOJ is too hard on them, explaining that the goal of the Countrywide pact, which he says could grant some victims “tens of thousands” of dollars, was to maximize the amount that goes directly to victims
When asked by Grassley why the settlement doesn’t include removal of executives who knew of illegal practices at the banks, Perez answers, “That’s an idea worth considering.”
As part of the settlement, borrowers who were victims of higher fees will receive at least $700 but no more than $2,000, while borrowers who were steered into expensive subprime loans will receive considerably more depending on a case-by-case analysis of what they would have saved in a lower interest rate loan.
Login to read the full story or Subscribe now!
Other Recent Stories
Wisconsin U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R) becomes the first lawmaker to openly reject the income tax reform legislation wending its way at uncustomary speed through Congress, accusing colleagues of ramming legislation to completion that would only benefit large corporations.
The House Financial Services Committee clears four housing proposals for a floor vote, and at least three have a chance of clearing the House and Senate and being enacted into law.
An abrupt fall in the Federal Housing Administration’s flagship Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund, despite HUD’s frequent assurances to the contrary, rules out any insurance premium cuts for 2018. The FHA annual report to Congress portrays a capital reserve fund that ultimately
Following months of bargaining between conservatives and largely liberal coastal area lawmakers, the House endorses a renewal of the National Flood Insurance Program along a strict 237-189 party-line vote. The acrimony surrounding the move guarantees the bill will met
Homebuilders are grappling with labor shortages and spiking costs of building materials as they attempt to regroup following the devastation wrought by hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria. The post-storm turmoil likely will impact housing construction across the country, costs that will
Rates for home mortgage loans increase to the highest level since July as investors shed Treasury bonds in anticipation of tax reform that would inflate the budget deficit by forcing more federal borrowing. “The 10-year Treasury yield ticked up 6 basis points, while the 30-year
House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) is hinting at the possibility of a second stopgap spending law to avert what congressional conservatives fear could be a last-minute rush to enact a “Christmas tree” spending bill for FY 2018. The far right Freedom Caucus, while meager in
The City of New York Department of Investigation issues a scathing report accusing the chairwoman of the New York City Housing Authority of falsifying reports over lead paint safety inspections. The report says Shola Olatoye knew in the summer of 2016 that the NYCHA’s
With the Republican congressional majority putting its primary legislative focus on income tax reform, debate over the FY 2018 spending authorization takes a back seat and that may force lawmakers into a second stopgap spending law in December.
A deal among congressional lawmakers to renew the National Flood Insurance Program fell flat at the last minute, and the House leadership postponed a vote on the agreement until the week of Nov. 13 at the earliest.