Housing Affairs Letter

Justice Slammed Over Countrywide Pact

Senators fault the Justice Department for its acceptance of a $355 million settlement between the agency and Bank of America over alleged mortgage lending bias by the bank’s Countrywide Financial Corporation subsidiary. The lawmakers on the Judiciary Committee argue that payments going to some borrowers aren’t enough to remedy damages.

The settlement focuses on race, alleging that some black and Hispanic borrowers between 2004 and 2008 were charged higher interest rates and fees because of their race, not because of their credit history or ability to pay the premiums. The pact also alleges that minority borrowers with strong credit were targeted and steered into subprime loans when similarly qualified white borrowers were awarded prime loans.

Lawmakers took out their ire on Thomas Perez, assistant attorney general of the DOJ’s civil rights division. Perez acknowledges the shortcomings in the settlement, explaining it was not a “home run,” but he defends the move saying the DOJ has set up a task force to investigate and pursue illegal financial activity as a result.

That explanation doesn’t sit will with Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA), the panel’s ranking Republican. “The department’s message is crime does pay,” Grassley says. “Light settlements and no prosecutions not only do not deter. They invite crimes of this sort to occur against similar future victims,”

Grassley addresses the estimated average settlement of $1,700 per victim among the more than 200,000 blacks and Hispanics involved in the settlement.

Perez responds that banks complain the DOJ is too hard on them, explaining that the goal of the Countrywide pact, which he says could grant some victims “tens of thousands” of dollars, was to maximize the amount that goes directly to victims

When asked by Grassley why the settlement doesn’t include removal of executives who knew of illegal practices at the banks, Perez answers, “That’s an idea worth considering.”

As part of the settlement, borrowers who were victims of higher fees will receive at least $700 but no more than $2,000, while borrowers who were steered into expensive subprime loans will receive considerably more depending on a case-by-case analysis of what they would have saved in a lower interest rate loan.

Login to read the full story or Subscribe now!

Other Recent Stories

If Congress embraces the framework of President Donald Trump’s federal spending guidelines for FY 2018, the move would effectively restrain HUD’s new Fair Housing Act enforcement program and accelerate implementation of the Rental Assistance Demonstration program.
If President Donald Trump insists on providing money in the FY 2017 spending bill to build a wall along the U.S. southern border, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer ((D-NY) suggests there could be a government shutdown in May.
A new report in the HUD inspector general’s continuing stream of criticism of department mismanagement says HUD is unable to keep an eye on an FHA $16 billion insurance program covering borrower-financed downpayment assistance programs.
With the National Flood Insurance Program expiring Sept. 30, lawmakers brace for a long fight to renew the law. Lawmakers insist on participation by private insurers to fill an insurance gap created by insurer refusal to write policies unless they have high premiums to cover the risk.
Housing economists say there is little worry the latest hike in the nation’s benchmark interest rate will have a significant fallout on average mortgage rates for the time being.
An upbeat jobs report and the prospect of an increase in the nation’s benchmark interest rate sends mortgage interest rates up again, signaling the days of record low rates below the 4% mark are likely history. The Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey for the week ending
Roiled over the Trump administration’s signal it wants to cut $6 billion from the HUD budget, advocacy groups link to create “CarsonWatch.” The new umbrella group for the Poverty & Race Research Action Council, Public Advocates, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law,
The Pacific Legal Foundation challenges Seattle’s new mandate forcing landlords to rent to the first qualified person who applies for a unit. PLC lawyers contend that denying owners the freedom to choose among qualified applicants and to exercise nondiscriminatory discretion
When former HUD Secretary Julian Castro departed Jan. 20, he left his predecessor HUD Secretary Ben Carson with an almost insurmountable financial mess – how to properly account for the billions of dollars the agency gets from Congress to administer its programs.
A draft budget report shows HUD could be in for a $6 billion budget cut for FY 2018, a drastic one-year dip into the department’s spending HAL first reported to you in January but likely not the end-all spending blueprint.